|
Major Milestones in Poverty Reduction in Ontario |
|||||||||||
|
Milestone |
First Upper Canada Statute |
Charity Aid Act – Upper Canada |
Confederation
|
First Distinct Government Role in Poverty Alleviation |
First Mothers Allowance |
First Social Assistance Rates (Direct Cash Relief) |
First Nutrition Standards in assistance to poor |
Canada Assistance Plan |
Report of the Social Assistance Review Committee |
Poverty Reduction Strategy |
|
|
Date |
1792 |
1836 |
1867 |
1889 |
1920 |
1932 |
1943 |
1967 |
1988 |
2008 |
|
|
Significance |
No Poor Law in Upper Canada No government responsibility for poor or poverty |
First public declaration of public responsibility of poor assigned to Churches and charity |
Clarification of Provincial responsibility for issues related to poverty and civil rights |
Call for assumption of public administration of relief to poor as opposed to Govft funding in support of charities or churches |
First cash assistance specifically aimed at poverty reduction (6 years after Workersf Compensation for selected target group (1914) |
Led to 1935 Unemployment Relief Act where governments mandated to meet needs of all poor for the first time |
First public assistance rates based on nutritional standards of Need – led to 43 annual SPC Guides to Family Budgeting |
First Canada wide cost sharing of public assistance with Canada wide standards |
Widely seen as most comprehensive review of social assistance in Ontario and Canada |
First Targets and measures in Legislation Annual reporting etc. |
|
|
Report |
Law – proclaims Upper Canada as government. |
Law |
BNA Act s.91&92 British North America Act of 1867 |
Goldwin Smith: Social Problems: An Address delivered to the Combined City Charities; 1889 (Toronto) |
gMothers Allowance: An Investigationh by W.R Riddell & Margaret Kirkpatrick Strong |
Wallace Campbell: gProvincial Policy on Administrative Methods in the Matter of Direct Relief in Ontarioh Royal Commission
|
Report of Dr. E.W. McHenry, U of T School of Hygiene Report of Food Allowances for Relief Recipients in Ontario, U of T, 1943 |
Law: Family Benefits and General Welfare Assistance |
Transitions (Judge George Thomson ) Back on Track, Time for Action, PMSSR, Turning Point Spinoff reports |
Breaking the Cycle |
|
|
Primary Sources or Authors |
Richard Splane, History of Social Welfare in Ontario 1791-1893, University of Toronto, 1965.
|
Clifford Williams, Decades of Service, History of the Ministry of Community and Social Services, 1984. James Struthers, The Limits of Affluence, Welfare in Ontario, 1920-1970, University of Toronto 1994 Press Margaret Hillyard Little, No car, No radio, No Liquor Permit, p.191-197.; Stapleton & Laframboise, The Campbell Report, 2005
|
n/a |
||||||||
|
Comment |
gThat nothing in this Act shallcintroduce any of the laws of England respecting maintenance of the poorh |
First Buildings in 1837 - Following Rebellion and Lord Durham Report, Toronto inaugurates first House of Industry in 1848 – Façade at Elizabeth & Elm in Toronto dates from 1837 and 1848 |
Clarification of provincial role to alleviate poverty within Confederation |
Led to first public assistance eworkerf (relieving Officer) in Toronto in 1893 |
Mothers (widows only) paid $55 a month in Toronto if they had at least two children, British subject and were gfit mothersh |
Campbellfs rates of cash relief formed framework for Crollfs mandate to pay cash relief |
16,000 recipients remained on assistance in 1943 after over 300,000 received help in 1930fs –led to Mothers Allowance Increases |
First standards across Canada – no residency requirement – assets, earnings
|
First Report to call for Child Benefits outside of welfare, reduced role of social assistance, |
First Report to set legislative targets and measures for the alleviation of poverty. |
|
|
Key Leader(s) |
Lt. Gov John Graves Simcoe |
Sir Francis Bond Head |
John S. Macdonald, first Premier of Ontario, John A MacDonald, P.M. |
Sir Oliver Mowat, Premier |
United Farmers of Ontario (UFO) Nellie McClung Agnes McPhail |
Minister David Croll implemented Campbell report under Hepburn |
Dr. Percy Vivian Minister, George Drew, Premier |
Minister John Yaremko, Deputy James Band |
Minister John Sweeney Premier David Peterson |
Deb Matthews, Premier Mc Guinty |
|
|
Rationale |
-Utopian - Centralist -feared capacity of government to fulfill |
-Pressure of British Reform of Poor Law of 1834 -WL Mackenzie led 1837 rebellion in part to counter adoption of English Laws of any sort. |
National Government – separation of powers –Federal govft did not have income tax until 1917. |
State – municipal role in administration which did not occur before 1893 |
Influenza, war return, suffragettes, munitions widows with no pensions. |
Firing of civil servants with Conservative membership, municipal bankruptcy |
Different caseload of 16,000 people – concern for nutrition & vitamins |
Federal role in public assistance rationalization of services & programs |
Welfare unpopular but public saw as inadequate. |
OCB in place Ontario public opinion. |
|
|
Reason for inclusion in milestones |
Clear non-responsibility of state for poverty; Upper Canada only |
First legislative statement in Upper Canada of responsibility to fund anti-poverty 44 years after Simcoe Law in 1792 |
Clarification of Provincial responsibility Constitutionally for poverty-related programs |
First successful call for direct state intervention in poverty reduction |
First direct cash relief for poverty issue of individuals that was not related to war effort. |
First legislative call for direct cash relief to all poor – 1935 – first time in legislation |
First evidence-based link of direct cash to nutrition needs of poor |
First agreement of provinces with national rules for cash assistance - National standards |
First report calling for comprehensive approach for poverty and reduced role of social assistance |
First time a Canadian government provides targets and measures to reduce poverty in legislation after largest market crash in history.| |
|
| @ | @ | @ | @ | @ | @ | @ | @ | @ | @ | @ | @ |